hypothetically speaking about hypothetical thoughts to answer hypothetical questions

most "hypothetical" questions have actual literal answers. the word is just used to make room for other probabilities and human error... and mainly because we don't have enough balls to admit any of the negative (realistic) possibilities. yah feel me?!

what can i do? ^_^

howlllllllllllllllllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

to film lovers
to animation lovers
to literature and poetry lovers
to the gay, lesbian, bisexual and straight lovers
and mostly to allen ginsburg lovers......
go see "howl."
now.
that will be all.

what can i do? ^_^

sci-fi??? the so-called science in this film is the fictitious part. it simply doesn't exist

cinematographer adam kimmel (capote, lars and the real girl) deserves more credibility than mark romanek (1hr photo) himself for this kazuo ishiguro's sci-fi novel adaptation of "never let me go." predictable. formulaic. it simply failed at trying so hard to be profound. without kimmel's seamless cinematography, it would have just seemed like an acceptable, slightly higher than average kind of lifetime original movie with a relatively good cast.

what can i do? ^_^

mexploitation!!!

sometimes it's hard to take rodriguez's movies in because of his stylistic, peculiar, 70's mexploitation approach, but this movie was only one hour long and extremely compact. hands down hilarious and entertaining. de niro's bush/mccain-esque role and the endless, conspicuous propaganda of the current immigration issues in arizona were simply b-a-d-a-s-s.

what can i do? ^_^